So I came across an article about how there were too many K-5 teachers & not enough teaching positions and the question arose in my mind: Why study something that you know will not pay off?
I remember when I was applying to college (many moons ago) my father always warned me to not major in underwater basket weaving. Yes, because it’s not a real major but also because it’s a profession that isn’t highly valued in this society. So in the same respect if you know that philosophy isn’t a highly valued field why major in it?
Yes, there are plenty of majors that were popular 20-30 years ago that may not be as relevant now (think archaeology, library science, etc.) but back then people knew that there would a job waiting for them. Right now the unemployment/under-employment rate for fresh college graduates is over 50%. I mean, let’s face it – the economy has been in the toilet since at least 2008. And everyone knows that bad economies don’t just turn around overnight. So those who are just now graduating (who entered college around 2008) must have known that when they graduate they might not have a job waiting for them in their field. And those who entered college after 2008 have had time to change majors to something more relevant. Of course no can tell the future or when the job market will pick up. But until it does, wouldn’t it be fair to say you should secure your future by majoring in something more mainstream instead?
Sure, it’s great to follow your passion but if your passion can’t pay the bills when you graduate, then maybe you should consider pursuing something that will instead.
A woman I know recently decided to go from working full time to part time so that she could stay home & spend more time with her family. Not wanting to completely be a stay-at-home mom, she decided that the only way to sustain her career would be to keep one foot in the working world and one foot at home. I’m sure her husband is glad to have her around the house more & her children will benefit from increased attention, but where does that leave her career?
Currently, the unemployment rate is hovering right around 8%. Depending on what part of the country you live in that percentage may be significantly higher. After working long & hard to build a solid career and then starting a family, you are now willing to possibly through that away? It’s one thing to start working part-time after not working at all, because of a company mandate, or if you have special circumstances (disability, spouse is deployed to another country, etc.). But to purposely cut back your working hours and your household income right when you might need it the most? Some of the women who do this are the same women who complain about not moving up in their careers. Of course, returning to full time employment is always an option but they should be glad to even have a job, given that so many people (with families) are still looking for work.
Family should always come first, but is it worth sacrificing your career as a woman? Especially in such an unstable economy? People are being laid off left & right and pink slips are becoming more popular than pay slips, so why risk providing less for your family, or at the very least why risk not being able to provide at all?
It’s so ironic to me that decades & decades after women fighting to work outside the home and earn equal pay (although we’re still not quite there), we now have women who are fighting to stay at home and NOT work at all. I can’t say that I agree with this woman’s decision. I think that she should continue to work full time and raise her family at the same time.
I’m not saying it will be easy but if she doesn’t really want her job someone else will.
Yesterday, I was having my normal daydream of becoming rich & retiring young. There was a time when I thought that I would always work even if I was rich, ensuring that my education & expertise wouldn’t go to waste. A lot of my friends thought that was a stupid notion, telling me that the whole purpose of working is to get rich (or make lots of money, at the very least). But I have always defended my position because I think that working to make lots of money is only part of the equation.
As an underrepresented minority working in Corporate America, I want to make sure that I continue to set an example for other young African American women that may want to enter the rankings of Corporate America. As it stands, currently less than 20% of the Fortune 500 companies are led by a woman and only 1% by an African American. So, to me, there is a great need to increase visibility of African Americans in the workforce, whether they were rich or not.
However, as I continued to think about the current employment rate (resting at 8% nationally, 7% for females, 14% for African Americans) I believe it is in the best interest of those that need to work for those with money to stop working. Okay, let me repeat that: If you have money and don’t need to work then you shouldn’t be working. Save the job & salary for someone that really needs it. If your husband makes enough to support your family then don’t be greedy by getting a job. Let another woman have your spot in the workforce. There’s nothing wrong with loving your craft & wanting to work in your field but understanding the current economy, it makes no sense to “steal” an income from someone else when you don’t really have to.
Women like Vanessa, Melinda & Jane (the wives of Kobe Bryant, Bill Gates & Alan Mulally, the CEO of Ford Motor Company) have got the right idea. Don’t work if you don’t have to.